I’ve been considering the relationship of the Invisible God I had been acquainted with since before I can remember because of my family’s introduction.Since life is a fluidity, a mobile continuum, we people are always in the process of reevaluating what we believe, what we think, where we are in life, what our goals are. Perpetual discernment. So that’s where I am again… one of those swings of life, where everything one once assumed gets re-questioned because of a decision, a different place of life. So I’m here in California, my third semester of Grad school , studying theology which I’ve been told is faith-seeking –understanding. Sometimes I wonder about the studies I engage in, whether they are too heady about God and whether the categories and theories I’m studying about God tell me more about Him or more about the people in our world. The questions I’ve been asking lately are those concerning the sense I’ve developed of Christianity as an institutionalized religion being an evolved entity that negotiates between a plane of totalitarian, absolute abstracts and subjective experience of human persons. I look at what has become Christian religion, and I look at Jesus Christ, the Jewish Rabbi who was a bit looney, eventually a bit heretical, and a bit brilliant in his commentary expanding Moses. Paul took the unframed, thematic thoughts of Jesus and developed a lot of what we based Christianity off of today.
But look at us. A DC Talk song comes to mind (as I sit at work, enjoying a small piece of chocolate….) “what have we become, o self indulgent people; O what have we become, tell me where are the righteous ones! What have we become in a world degenerated? Speak your mind, look out for yourself, the answer to it all is a life of wealth, grap on and keep ‘cause you just live once, you got the right to do whatever you want, don’t worry about others or where they came from, it ain’t what you were it’s what you become…” So what does Christianity as a systematized, institutionalized faith look like to me at the moment, a 5 month and 12 day old Catholic in the most systematized and hegemonic system of thought. In saying that, I realize its incredibly pluralistic and diverse. But in the little Catholic world I live in, where liturgy is a commonly debated subject amongst people I know, an emphasis on the human dimension of embodiment is deemed deserving of the most dignity in creation, and Aristotelian thought is used to categorically delineate analogies to understand God from the world. Hm, and yet, too, a sense of wonder and mystery paradoxically eclipse all the human reason which is at our base of religious-beingness-in-world.
I would be the first to admit that I don’t intellectually understand a faith purpose for sacraments, these outward signs of inward grace… symbolic actions that are supposed to be embedded with a presence of Christ through an epiclesis of the Holy Spirit, and finding their doctrinal validity in a teaching that Christ instituted the sacraments, they are seen as necessary for a full celebration and participation in the Christian faith by my Church family. I struggle with that, as I struggle with any sort of necessary embeddedness in the physical world. And yet, my recent personal encounter with sacraments beyond a sort of abstract theological consideration has brought a deeper intensity to my own struggle with embodiment, with knowing my God, understanding (or rather living well in, because I don’t think human nature is something meant to be intellectually comprehended) my own self as a human woman.
I will tangent for a moment to mention, in line with understanding God through what I sense and comprehend in relationship, to discuss a Sufi Islamic poet whose evasive concept of the invisible, intangible Beloved and means of knowing, introducing Him has captured my imagination since I bought the collection of 43 of his odes, “Like This”. One of his odes answers the questions of persons wondering about things from the resurrection of Jesus to how miracles were performed with the interaction of a person: “Like this.” So how are we God’s presence to one another, is it known through this? “If anyone wants to know what ‘spirit’ is or what ‘God’s fragrance’ means, lean your head toward him or her. Keep your face close there. Like this.” So I am a bit curious about this manner of knowing God, in and through one another. Reading snatches of Levinas lately, and talking about this philosopher with some of my friends, the concept of knowing God solely through human interaction has come up again and again. I guess that’s where sacraments are “redemptive,” saving God’s reputation from being too tangled up in the persons we love.
Yet, there’s something to knowing Jesus the only way we can though others, in addition to the gift of revelatory text we’ve been given that is problematically composed and compiled by human persons. Yet, I unintellectually somehow sense the truth of this being divine revelation. I think that sense, that kind of knowing, must be my faith, which is still faith without re-creatable reason. I used to have reasons for everything I thought, by the dynamism of life combined with faith has altered those. Its really kind of exciting. We relive the same sorts of questions over and over, and each time, they are different. I love reading the Adekah, the binding of Isaac in Genesis 22, partly because it manifests so many of my own questions, but also because each time I read through it to reflect on sacrifice in relationship, I see it in a different light. Still in composition of this year’s reflection. But it will be intensely relational. What does it mean to trust God in our lives, what does it mean to be open with others, how do those two planes intersect and where do we interact with God in this life here.
It makes me smile to think of the dear people who ask why try, why look for the more, why always be moving. This semester, I am attempting a new endeavor in understanding the rest of God… it sint so much a dismantling of an intense schedule (40+ hours of work a week, 4 classes including Hebrew, my foreign language of choice), but a disposition within the schedule. An attempt not to run between so many places… the Dominican School of Philosophy and Theology, the Hergl Center where I work almost 30 hours a week, and my little new El Cerrito apartment create the Bermuda triangle my hurricane self whirls between day in and day out. And as a laywoman with a heart to belong to my God, I find myself needing to learn a deeper sense of integration to maintain or recreate a spirituality in which I move through daily everydayness. I think that spirituality, whatever that means anymore, is becoming conflated with the concept of love in my mind. Maybe its not a conflation, but a unification.
If love is the way we are to be in the world, not just a love out of pity for the less fortunate, but a love which allows us to relate those things which are different from us, other, if you will… love is how we find whatever is equality is, by emptying our egos of their natural self-bent conceitedness to care and extend oneself to hear what the other person questions and cares for. The title of these musings reveals something I am learning about myself and the way I love people… a heart inside with its walls on the epedermis of my skin, sensing or empathizing with others in relationship. That kind of alerts me to a dangerous sensitivity, which I often allow to fold up and hide away rather than expose with a question. So I am getting to know Jesus by Himself more through the text of scripture and other mysteries which don’t exactly seem to have a logic, and Jesus with others through trying to open myself a little more to this care for persons. Obviously, a busy schedule includes varying degrees of time for that to be shared in, and the personal one maybe least of all. In spite of that fact, I hope maybe some of these musings will encourage further life sharing, which seems to be just good in and of itself!

