Just some reflections on the new Papal Encycical Caritas in Veritate…..paragraph by paragraph….
1. Love as a force of movement… in explicating the passage that “love rejoices in the truth,” our Pope discusses how the ways of defending truth are different ways of loving. These two lines beautifully express the heart of what I feel Catholicism needs to continue crusading… “All people feel the interior impulse to love authentically: love and truth never abandon them completely, because these are the vocation planted by God in the heart and mind of every human person. The search for love and truth is purified and liberated by Jesus Christ from the impoverishment that our humanity brings to it, and he reveals to us in all its fullness the initiative of love and the plan for true life that God has prepared for us.” Loving in truth… becomes connected with the face of Jesus, and how imaging that face becomes our vocation when we love one another “in truth” for Christ Himself is Truth. When I read this, I immediately thought of how Jesus would become more real in us, more present on earth… if we are the body of Christ, then H becomes more present on earth as Love in giving ourselves truly to one another.
2. Love being the source and synthesis of the entire Law, since God Himself is love, it is the only substantial factor in all principles and relationships. “Truth needs to be sought, found and expressed within the “economy” of charity, but charity in its turn needs to be understood, confirmed and practised in the light of truth.” How unpin-able is love, devoid of an absolute, defining expression… and even more confusing is love, the Pope recognizes how current society and Western culture relativizes truth. Love as an expression of truth?
3. “charity can be recognized as an authentic expression of humanity and as an element of fundamental importance in human relations, including those of a public nature.” but since love is in need of a direction, a path dictated by the light of truth (which is the directing glow of faith and reason)… without truth, the pope says love is directionless, arbitrary– a shell which will be misdirected without the guidance of truth. Since we live in a culture already recognized as devoid of truth, the expression of love in our society has been denigrated to emotionalism…. feelings. Chemicals firing in the brain, a searching for satisfaction and comfort.
4. “A Christianity of charity without truth would be more or less interchangeable with a pool of good sentiments, helpful for social cohesion, but of little relevance.” so perhaps the sense of meaning and purpose I keep searching after is that filling-ness of truth; somehow, if the truth sets us free… then we find charity, this ‘true’ sort of love… really freed from a “narrow field devoid of relations.” What is love if we cannot relate it… I remember a song very popular among my friends and I called “Love is a Verb” which spoke of love as active. I believe faith is also active… but both have their senses where they are presences of action.
5. “Charity is love received and given.” I think its presence in us is demonstrated by the two-way path cut by truth through our hearts… to be an “instrument of charity” we are given both an inclination towards receptivity and gifting… I think as long as we remain in truth, those channels the Holy Spirit cuts through us when It baptizes us in the grace of faith. A dynamic grace we are given. The moment we misdirect our eyes from truth, our vision of ability to give or receive love is clouded… I agreed with the sentiment that love in truth might be a sort of “satisfactory solution to the grave socio-economic problems besetting humanity” but I think the realization that heaven is apart from here in its full sense, while we are indeed building it now, needs to be remembered. We will always have the poor… how does that needfully affect our enactment of love? should it just encourage us to never give up heart?
6. What does justice and the common good look like through loving in truth? If every society manufactures its own system, but love going beyond justice tries to erect the kingdom of heaven via just principles, but also moving beyond justice. The Pope defines loving as giving… but I would add that I think its also keeping open the channel of receiving. If we love someone, we will accept from them out of care for their giving. So maybe that just adds to the Pope’s consideration of how the earthly city is not just built by right governance but by care, a transcendent value which brings heaven down to earth.
7. Since “to love someone is to desire that person’s good and to take effective steps to secure it,” the Pope weaves together the idea of freeing love by the inspiration of truth: “the more we strive to secure a common good corresponding to the real needs of our neighbours, the more effectively we love them;” yet Jesus spoke of coming to divine father from Son, husband and wife, friends… is that seeking of the truth the dividing point? Will we agree to common good? Connecting the seeking of universal human good through earthly activity, the Holy Father introduces the “history of the human family” which offers dimensions which shape the entire community into “a prefiguration of the undivided city of God.”
8.
a beautiful picture of the two-way street of God’s gift of graceful love… He gifts the grace of love, and entrusts ” us with the task of travelling the path of development with all our heart and all our intelligence[7], that is to say with the ardour of charity and the wisdom of truth.” I think our greatest enemies in this love-quest are definitely ourselves and the despair we can conjure up… our own realization of unworthiness which is the most present and obvious weight and presence in all Christianity I’ve experienced… even to the point of where we shed our own blood to try and pay rather than accept Christ’s. Guilty.
9. This remark was fascinating: “The risk for our time is that the de facto interdependence of people and nations is not matched by ethical interaction of consciences and minds that would give rise to truly human development.” Recognizing the inability of Church authority to speak into political issues, the Pope maintained that the mission of truth remained for the Pope. “Her social doctrine is a particular dimension of this proclamation: it is a service to the truth which sets us free. Open to the truth, from whichever branch of knowledge it comes, the Church’s social doctrine receives it, assembles into a unity the fragments in which it is often found, and mediates it within the constantly changing life-patterns of the society of peoples and nations.”
Chapter 1: The Message of Populorum Progressio
10. According to the Holy Father’s consideration of the Tradition of apostolic faith, Populorum Progressio maintains roots beyond sociological data.
11. Describing the contents of Populorum Progressio the Holy Father describes two truths:
(1) the public work and presence of the Church is to advance humanity, and
(2) “authentic human development concerns the whole of the person in every single dimension.”
the dimension of this paragraph I especially appreciated was the Pope’s recognition that institutions are not enough “to guarantee the fulfilment of humanity’s right to development” because it is an individual vocation. If we individual persons don’t freely assume responsibility to engage, enforced by institution, the very “right to human development” becomes dehumanizing.
12. “It is one thing to draw attention to the particular characteristics of one Encyclical or another, of the teaching of one Pope or another, but quite another to lose sight of the coherence of the overall doctrinal corpus.” Well said, Holy Father Benedict XIV. I appreciate the overview of adherence to tradition, this idea of patrimony that is continued from Jesus Christ via the Apostles and Fathers following after them. The issue of “meaningless repetition” that I was warned about in my pre-Catholic years of following Jesus is well-addressed in this paragraph: “Coherence does not mean a closed system: on the contrary, it means dynamic faithfulness to a light received. The Church’s social doctrine illuminates with an unchanging light the new problems that are constantly emerging.” God is the Unchanged-Ever-Changing as far as we can see Him: always the same, but how newly we always experience Him, how new His promises are every morning. Our Lord never changes, and yet there is something so dynamic about His relationship with us, the leading and communication of His will, through the same Word.
13. It is very difficult for some of us who are used to living in a culture where two separate lines of thought are expected between Faith and Government to separate our Christian lives from our social interactions. Wrestling through separation of self from the world, and the whole idea of being in, but not of the world these past months of my life, Holy Father Benedict’s emphasis of Pope Paul VI’s social teaching impressed me: “the indispensable importance of the Gospel for building a society according to freedom and justice, in the ideal and historical perspective of a civilization animated by love.” How can all my life be animated by love. How can I carry the Love of Jesus as the burning torch of my heart as I marathon, the same Hannah behind the walls of churches, school, work, and walking these streets of Berkeley. How will I make Your Love visible in me, all the time?
14. Further addressing the idea of “human development” counter to some claims made about tradition today, the Holy Father corrects supposed notions attributed to tradition “as radically anti-human and merely a source of degradation” by stating that “the idea of a world without development indicates a lack of trust in man and in God.” I especially appreciated his recognition of something I feel often in my own nature… “the fact that man is constitutionally oriented towards ‘being more’.” We push our limits if we believe we might have some.. we try, as sojourners to discover ourselves and our boundaries and those of others so we know how the lives may best intertwine. Somehow in this aspiring to be more in the persons we are… notice it is be more not do more. I am still learning the extent of our personhood is not only confined to what we do… nor is our worth as persons.
15. Discussing the other social documents of Paul VI, Humanae Vitae and Evangelii Nuntiandi, Holy Father Benedict brings together the discussions of individual and group ethics with the connection between “life ethics” and social ethics. Quoting John Paul II’s Evangelium Vitae, ‘The Church forcefully maintains this link between life ethics and social ethics, fully aware that “a society lacks solid foundations when, on the one hand, it asserts values such as the dignity of the person, justice and peace, but then, on the other hand, radically acts to the contrary by allowing or tolerating a variety of ways in which human life is devalued and violated, especially where it is weak or marginalized.”’ I was just discussing the strange contradiction of relationships that we have with ourselves in modern American society, and thus with our ability to love itself, with a friend earlier: we are taught to think so much of ourselves, create our own truth, etc… and yet at the root, we find nothing in ourselves that we are proud of, in fact we hate ourselves. Yet we insist on listening to ourselves as the supreme authority, though in our weak times we are self-negligent at best and self-destructive at worst. We seem to be caught up doing everything we can to lose our lives, while with the same manner of intensity, pursuing the activity of life: the opposing passions would appear, to me, to cancel each other out and leave us neutral, relational vegetables in comatose states of loving… apathetic towards true love, and superficially attempting to placate a deeper ache by sentiment and feeling. Diving into the second of Paul VI’s social documents, Holy Father Benedict notes another frequently forgotten element of the Christian life: we are not gnostically all about the ethereal… we are all about the embodied soul! Beautifully put… “Testimony to Christ’s charity, through works of justice, peace and development, is part and parcel of evangelization, because Jesus Christ, who loves us, is concerned with the whole person.”
16. In light of all else he had connected to this point, the Holy Father brings together the ideas of human development as right of society and a personal calling by highlighting how “In Populorum Progressio, Paul VI taught that progress, in its origin and essence, is first and foremost a vocation.” The Gospel in light of society is the work of continual duty of each successive Christian generation. So yes, we have changed since the time of Jesus, and the expression of “true humanism” as the Holy Father puts it, must continue to espouse the love of Jesus’ heart, which is always open to God, “conscious of a vocation which gives human life its true meaning.”
17. The tension between institutional structures and individual freedom. One might think that any institutional denial of freedom under obligations depletes us of freedom… yet the Pope notes that “the humility of those who accept a vocation is transformed into true autonomy.” Accepting our vocations, our lives as we have been given them and stepping into who we have been made to be sounds extremely freeing on the one hand, but binding as well. Autonomy? Is this an independence of all obligation in favor of an entirely self-directed life? What sort of freedom would that be? I think of life in the sort I am growing into… and note that for me, freedom and greatest capacity is not withholding myself from submission to rules or authorities… those are for my stability in regards to surface structures so that I am not trapped in the surface, aching for depth, but able to plunge deeper.
18. ‘The vocation to progress drives us to “do more, know more and have more in order to be more”. But herein lies the problem: what does it mean “to be more”? ‘ Excellent question. And while the Holy Father explains in a more complicated manner, for the Christian, for every person, Jesus is our more. Being made into the likeness of Christ in our individual vocations… which unite with the world in the development of humanity. Except the Pope notes that Christianity takes this global vision of man becoming more to a greater possibility than that limited to earth…. Jesus as the God-Man requires us to accept truth, boundary and direction… authority… in order to transcend from the natural plane. I think its hard to remember that original nature was inclusive of the supernatural… our natures are just unable to think or imagine the grace which rescues the gaze from only inward to outward…. to upward… the transcendent humanism… to be like the Jesus-more we are going after.
19. Understanding that human development is a vocation, working towards that more in the person of Jesus… it makes perfect sense that charity is central to this development. Yet, I am thinking in relational terms again: If I want to become like someone, reach the transcendent human possibility that is laid out for me in a supernatural plane by the person of Jesus, how can I pursue it, but that I open my self to receiving that gift of love-grace He offers. I must submit to something more than me, accepting shows that I lack what perfect Love holds… and thus I become obedient to learning love. As I read the Holy Father’s words, I see his mind working in a different mode to my own, mine in the central path of relationality readily confesses that “Reason, by itself, is capable of grasping the equality between men and of giving stability to their civic coexistence, but it cannot establish fraternity.” It is not in thinking we learn how to love, but we observe the movements of love… we observe ourselves… others, we calculate. It is in being immersed within, and overwhelmed out of ourselves, flooded until we have love pouring out of the holes in our hearts, hands, feet, and sides that we step into a process of meeting one another as brothers. parallel living is done be neighbors, but we are intersecting as brothers, meeting at points of giving away and accepting in one another.
20. I appreciated the connection between desperation and love that the Pope finds…”urgency is also a consequence of charity in truth.” Urgency not only stemming from the tides of life, but from knowing that we are and should be, brothers and sisters… that is the truth of humanity…. is there not one God and creator of all? Has not the One Son come to redeem all, would it not be best to renew the natures of all in grace so that we are all capable of journeying towards the oneness with God and others, spiritually and economically? If our hearts ache with urgency, they will open of their own accord, to that call of brotherhood, as truth separates us from the selfish and the most desirable. How do we ‘mobilize ourselves at the level of the “heart”’? Thats foreign language in my world. Is it the moving out, reaching out, always? Vulnerability, words we dont like to hear?