I have begun reading the fascinating work of N.T. Wright, Evil and the Justice of God, recently-published work as of 2006. Here are some thoughts and reflections triggered by the first chapter “Evil is Still a Four Letter Word”:
Wright says on Pg. 18 of Evil and the Justice of God that he does not speculate on evil, but rather finds himself “standing in the noble tradition of continuing my theological education in public” with all the shame, humiliation, growth, ridicule, and encouragement that implies; how gutsy.
On evil, “if we are to see more clearly what is going on, we need to factor certain things into our understanding which are normally screened out.” (19)
Because we still praise in the face of nastiness in life, we have a problem of understanding good’s existence in the midst of such a world versus evil (which seems to ordinary). Wright suggests “we who have heard of so many further disasters, both natural and man-made, can only perhaps continue to sing it (songs of praise) because we have a hard-won natural theology in the teeth of the negative counterevidence or because we have not stopped to think.” (20). Anyone who has struggled to win or stopped to think realizes the need for violence within the character.
Wright deems it an unfortunate, popular misconception to buy into Hegel’s philosophy of the doctrine of progress that: “everything was moving toward a better, fuller, more perfect end; and if there had to be suffering on the way, if there had to be problems as the dialectic unwound, so be it;” (21). Such is society’s belief, and I fear the Church’s too, in natural, automatic progress… that evolution is resulting in the better, not worsening of life.
Maybe I in my romantic idealist am part of the movement, which envisions “a study march toward freedom and justice, conceived often in terms of slow, but sure triumph of Western-style liberal democracy and soft versions of socialism” (22). That is not what I can place my hope in the world becoming. I want to redefine my idealism; I know I really need to… I do not understand a lot of the hate… the most recent fight between my friends left me feeling helpless after appeals to both of them to cease fighting and just talk. I have been seduced into pacifism… I am no longer an activist; I am merely striving for ideals with no hope of achieving them. To vocalize that position is one thing, to activate it, another. Can I hope for belief in someone without any potential of my hopes ever being actualized? I need hope in my life, in spite of circumstances. I have made those ideals… Jesus, how do I make it you? I cannot manufacture my own hope or achieve my own salvation, nor that of anyone else. I need more reality. Yet when I hit reality, I retreated into dreams, which formed so thick a fog around me, that the mists are still clearing away, and their confusion.
From Dostoyevsky, I retrieved the idea Wright plays with “in which he considers the possibility that the world might advance toward perfection at cost of torturing a single innocent child to death, and he concludes that the price is already too high.” (23) Are we already committing the three deadly sins of Leviticus 18, which will pollute out land? How do these sins look in our context of the people of God today… how are we adding to the problem of evil?
In describing the problem of evil as facing us today, Wright says “we ignore evil when it doesn’t hit us in the face… we are surprised by evil when it does… (and) we react in immature and dangerous ways as a result” (24) of being unprepared for evil. O Church, what are we doing? We are laying down our very shield of faith by disbelieving that God is just in His mercy… and we rely so much on the sympathy of His mercy that we have lost touch of the reality that God’s mercy includes pain and suffering because of who we are to retain right relationship with Him.
Its fascinating that Wright defines the realm beyond good and evil as “where might is right” (24), though this is not the sort of absolute I think of transcending human assignment of values. Wright acknowledges that good and bad are not so clear-cut as we try to define them, but that there is balance, which exists to “avoid too much dualism, too much polarization between good and evil.” (24) This causes me to turn my thoughts back to the question of the Sitra Achta, where people allow for the stuff we call “evil” within Yhwh. Such thin ice… or is this attempting to walk in water?
How can I say that “’choice’ is an absolute good for everyone”? (24) Wright notices that the very controls which affirm what is good and what is evil are not called “evil;” the very boundaries by which we maintain happiness are no longer acceptable, being blamed as stifling mechanisms to trigger evil in humans. I know I was born in desperate need of God, in depravity, because after the cross, I can look back and see Romans 7 in that self that needed the guidance of God. Makes me wonder how I can remember God more and more; must just be that time in the book, honest conversation and reflection before the throne of my Holy God which will allow me to forget more and more the old (will it ever go away? The evil stain on my memory?) as I try and remember Yhwh more and more.
Wright in talking about how we try and deny the harsh reality of life’s evil through existence testifies that we try and deny and drown out such realities as terrorism and death. He says that “death is banished from our from our societies… (and even from) our societal imagination, as the relentless quest for sexual pleasure—and sex, of course, is a way of laughing in the face of death…” (26). Wright puzzles me in how he ties two things in which society is so wrapped up in… death and sex? The terrible fear of death compelling the insatiable animal appetite? I cannot relate, I only understand as much as I see in others. Oh Church, why do we run from death when it has no victory over us? We are called to embrace the cross of our death… like our loving Jesus… and realize how much more alive we are for not being subject to its strong. Why do we still not have enough faith to face death well?
Slowly waning I think is maybe that last remaining evil which might fully pollute our land… the very worst, child sacrifice. What would compel us to give up our own children to such revolting perversions, even worse than death? “Child abuse is stomach-churningly disgusting,” Wright acknowledges, but this “one remaining taboo” is more a means of “lashing out at something you simply know is wrong… but it is hardly the way to build a stable moral society.” (27) Sadly, I think that relentless attack on the sanctity of childhood will result in the Church in America having to deal with government-approved child sacrifice because of our apathy. We have brought exile upon ourselves… we need to repent for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand… and yet we remain unmoved.
Wright suggests that we are indeed moved by evil, but moved in a state of immaturity to anger versus thoughtful, spirit-led reaction: “just as you cannot eliminate evil by act of Congress of by a philosophical argument, so you cannot do so with High Explosives.” (28) My reactions to evil demonstrate my immaturity in dealing with evil: Wright says I either “project evil out on to others, generating a culture of blame” or “we can project blame onto ourselves and imagine we are to blame for it all” (29). I think I do the latter over the former. Yet both are wrong understandings of evil in the world.
While I am currently interested with Wright’s question of how we grow out of our forced reactions/dealings with evil, but he prefers to move on to postmodernism in his perspective of the dilution of evil in this culture. I think his real beef with postmodern culture is the realization it brings of “increased demands for truth and increased difficulty in discerning it” (31). I am a product of my culture, a skeptic, but probably not wholly if I am honest, because I want answers and do not want to question endlessly… for there are always more things to explore; I must settle on an answer I can live with and let it grow and expand the more I experience. I can always get closer to God.
Wright almost makes “postmodernism” synonymous with “the problem of evil” which I just can’t do… it’s a way of approach; it defies logic, as does all belief. So it makes my faith harder, but I have so much more reason to believe because of the questions it forces me to pursue, in the face of evil. Wright’s beef with postmodernism is that is “remorselessly goes deeper than simply suggesting that all human claims are flawed; it deconstructs humans themselves.” (31) But to me, that just shows me how solid God’s unpredictableness is for me… as a song says “and I have come to you in search of faith, ‘cause I can’t see beyond this place; for you are God and I am man, and I leave it in Your hands.” Postmodernism increases the need for faith, I think.
Wright chooses to disagree, claiming the point of view that Postmodernism disables faith and leaves no hope for redemption. I cannot trust in myself, I think postmodernism really shows me that. He chooses to summarize the three aspects of realization in order to make any headway in understanding evil through three points: (1) confessing “that we may not have gotten democracy right” , (2) recognizing that evil has a “depth-dimension, a supra-personal element within it” and (3) acknowledging that good and evil run through all of us. Wright concludes with the supremacy of God over evil, as in over the chaos of the good-created sea: “Evil may still be a four-letter word. But so, thank God, is love.”(41)
WHEW! That was one intense chapter.