A response to the world’s favorite Rabbi…
Perhaps when I think about it, our type of covenant is strange because we see no “physical effects.” So let’s run with holistic theology for a while: I am perfectly ok in saying that sanctification-salvation includes BODY and spirit. Let’s not play anymore with Greek dualism, its too dangerous to say that my spirit co-exists apart from me, so Jesus now just overlooks my sin because I live under this “Forgiven” banner. What does it mean for me to be obedient, forgiven? Sure, there’s a sense of “once for all,” but that doesn’t erase the sin I have committed which continues to separate me from God.
I had the hardest time fathoming, in my fundamental, systematic theology, how God was not the changing factor between the Old Testament. But God does change, He shows Himself more. So let’s throw away that silly, systematic induction and start with the Bible, front to back. When I look back and see the OC, the perpetual picture in my mind is Isaiah “I am a man of unclean lips.”
In my mind, I most easily understand by picturing myself there: Recent reading about Levitical purity laws challenges me that simply when my body does not function the way it was designed to, that would keep me from God. So I make a temporary sacrifice at the time of sin, or impurity (I don’t think OC “sin” is always intentional disobedience to the will of God as we think of it, but even when one’s bodily systems don’t function as designed due to sickness, cycles, etc.), and yet carry the guilt a whole year until the day of Atonement. Even then, my sin was just moved off me, but not gone. God did take away my guilt, but somehow, that was still connected to me, even though I was forgiven. Well, maybe I can think in terms of covering.
In the Garden, nothing separated man from God because the perfect state of existence (without sin) allowed man to bask in a special presence with God. In the OC, sin covered me… ok, forgivable, but not defeated. So I still can’t be in God’s presence, because its shadow is hanging over me. This is a very silly example, but remember that picture of sin being dealt with on man’s level but accumulating in Heaven? I think it’s the heavenly picture that matters, and until that stuff is burned up in “heaven,” I am still separated from God (to a greater degree than in the NC). Maybe this was a heaviness carried by more than just the spirit (just a thought).
But now I move into the NC. I like the thought of the Spirit being the means through which I live righteously rather than the Law. Let’s face it, the Law didn’t deal specifically enough with life for me to live perfectly, and left to do what I think with the Law? Well, c’mon, I’ll just make a decision that feels most comfortable to me. I can obey, but I don’t always know HOW to obey. That’s a big difference, I think. The Spirit interpreting those blanket-stated laws in the life of a believer is why I argue that for me now, sin is avoidable. So submitting my will to the Spirit is following His guiding, even if I can’t hear a whispering voice in my ear saying “do this.” Its (wow, this will sound mystical) letting go of myself and walking in a way that is not my own. Practice at this, I think becomes a form of habit (“growing in godliness”?) and perpetual walking in it brings understanding of actions (maturity?).
So besides having the Spirit, I am also relieved of this shadow of sin. In fact, the Spirit replaces the shadow of sin. Not only am I uncovered of the dirty rags that impurified me and incapacitated me from entering to the presence of His holiness, but I am clothed in the Spirit. I am covered in His Spirit, I can enter into His holiness, not just the site of it. WOW. I am sanctified, set apart to Him and justified in His blood. Don’t play games with me and tell me that’s just positional. Listen, I didn’t say I am mature in Christ yet. Am I at that perfect state of existence like the garden where I can choose between right and wrong? I want to say yes. I am as perfectly able to choose as Adam. Adam had just as much agenda as I do when I say. The difference between me and Adam is that I have an overwhelmingly greater number of choices. He had one, I have about a thousand a millisecond. So what does this say about the then?
Well, let’s picture the new place with Jesus as King. Personally, I want it to all be in a garden; the most important stuff happened there: Man walked with God; man fell; Jesus wrestled with and overcame temptation. But so how will I be different than now? I think (Dr. Snyder, pardon my crazy liberalism, I really do love Jesus) that I will be faced with just as many decisions, or more, as I am now [who tempts me? That’s a different question] but I will have so great a love for the Law of God, and be so united with the Spirit that sin will be not just a defilement and abomination to God, but to me too. I’ll be risky and wonder if “heaven” is a state of being here on the new earth where I desire nothing but God. There are two desires in me now: comfort and God. Too often, comfort has won. But martyrs lose that. I think they’re realized something I am taking longer to learn, praise God.
I’m a damned (meaning in the sense of “headed for hell,” not swearing…) heretic for saying this, aren’t I?
Anyone think anything about all this?

